One Column Page

and responsive to boot

What Does "This Generation" Really Mean?
by Don K. Preston, D. Div.

This article appeared in the 2022 Fall issue of Fulfilled! Magazine

pdf version



The following was posted on a website in objection to preterism:


Therefore, behold, I am sending you prophets and wise men and scribes; some of them you will kill and crucify, and some of them you will scourge in your synagogues, and persecute from city to city, that upon you may fall the guilt of all the righteous blood shed on earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah, the son of Berechiah, whom you murdered between the temple and the altar. Truly I say to you, all these things shall come upon this generation.” (Matt 23:34-36).


Notice that it was “this generation” that murdered Zechariah, the son of Berechiah. The problem is that this murder took place 400 years earlier as recorded in 2 Chronicles 24:20-21. This tells us that Matthew’s use of the term ‘generation’ means something different than a mere life span of the people who were living at that time.”


It is interesting that futurists commonly tell us, “The Bible says what it means and means what it says,” and, “we have to take the Bible literally.” Yet, futurism refuses to accept biblical time statements for what they say and normally mean. In fact, futurists redefine an entire vocabulary of words. Soon cannot mean soon. At hand cannot mean imminent. Shortly does not mean quickly. And this generation cannot mean, well, this generation. 

Please understand that the only reason why people today look to redefine “this generation” to mean something other than Jesus’ contemporary generation is because of a preconceived eschatology. Because their concept of the nature of the Lord’s coming did not happen in that first-century generation, they redefine “this generation.” Because the Lord did not come—as they perceive that coming to be—shortly, they change the meaning of shortly, at hand, and quickly.

The amazing thing is, however, that while they tell us that this generation did not mean Jesus’ generation, many commonly tell us it is our “this generation”! While they tell us that at hand did not mean imminent in the first century, it does mean that now. While shortly come to pass did not mean it would happen shortly back then, it does mean that it will happen in our generation. But let’s look closer at the objection.

To examine and respond to the objection, thus establishing the correct meaning of this generation, we must examine some facts from the text:

1. Jesus said to the Jews standing around Him in the temple at that time: “fill up then the measure of your father’s guilt.”

2. “All of these things will come upon this generation.”

Jesus chronicled how throughout Israel’s history, the Jews had killed the prophets, and said that the people around Him at that time, would fill up the measure of that past internecine history: “you bear witness that you are the sons of those who killed the prophets; fill up then the measure of your father’s guilt” (Matt 23:31-32).

Jesus said that the people around Him—His contemporary generation—would fill up the measure of their forefather’s guilt, the guilt of killing the prophets. Jesus’ words establish an organic unity between the Old Testament martyrs and their killers. How would those people fill up the measure of their father’s blood guilt? Jesus is clear:

Therefore, indeed, I send you prophets, wise men, and scribes: some of them you will kill and crucify, and some of them you will scourge in your synagogues and persecute from city to city, that on you may come all the righteous blood shed on the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah, son of Berechiah, whom you murdered between the temple and the altar. (Matt 23:34-35)

So, the measure of blood guilt would be filled up by “this generation” by killing the apostles and prophets that Jesus would send. This raises some serious questions:

First, if one extrapolates “this generation” to some yet future time, it means that they must believe that in that proposed future “this generation” Israel finally fills up the measure of their sin by killing the apostles and prophets sent by Jesus. I have never encountered a futurist willing to accept the implications of this.

Would the objector say that there are living apostles and prophets being sent by Jesus today? If we still have living apostles and prophets of Jesus alive today, where are they? If they are truly apostles and prophets sent by Jesus then they are, by the very nature of the case, inspired, authoritative, and infallible! If the time (generation) of the apostles and prophets was Jesus’ generation, and there are no apostles and prophets of Jesus today—and there are not—then of necessity Jesus’ generation was the generation to fill up the measure of their sin. That was the generation upon whom the judgment would come.

Second, does the Bible tell us when Israel’s blood guilt would be filled up by killing Jesus’ apostles and prophets? Read 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16:

For you, brethren, became imitators of the churches of God which are in Judea in Christ Jesus. For you also suffered the same things from your own countrymen, just as they did from the Judeans, who killed both the Lord Jesus and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they do not please God and are contrary to all men, forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they may be saved, so as always to fill up the measure of their sins; but wrath has come upon them to the uttermost.

Could language be any clearer? Paul is clearly echoing Jesus’ temple words.

  • Just as Jesus said that Israel had a history of killing the prophets, Paul said the same.
  • Just as Jesus knew the Jews would kill Him, Paul lays that guilt at their feet.
  • Just as Jesus said that the Jews would kill his apostles and prophets, Paul said the Jews were currently killing the apostles and prophets of Jesus.
  • Just as Jesus said that Jerusalem would fill the measure of their father’s blood guilt, Paul said of the Jews, they “fill up the measure of their sins.”
  • Just as Jesus said, “all of these things shall come upon this generation,” Paul said, “wrath has come upon them to the uttermost.” The Greek of the text is very graphic, conveying the image of an imminent destruction.

The correlation between Matthew 23 and 1 Thessalonians is undeniable. That correlation proves that Jesus was indeed speaking of His contemporary generation. The fact is that since that generation was to fill the measure of her sin, then it logically follows that, “all of these things shall come upon this generation” refers to that same first-century generation. And there is more—actually, much, much more.

In Revelation, we find the Father—who knew the day and the hour of the end—telling the Son to inform the churches that, “these things must shortly come to pass,” for, “the time is at hand” (Rev 1:1-3). “These things” included the judgment of the persecutorial harlot city “Babylon”—“the hour of her judgment has come” (Rev 14:6f).  So, Who is This Babylon?

  • It was the city that killed the Old Testament prophets (Rev 16:6).
  • It is the city, “Where the Lord was crucified” (Rev 11:8).
  • Babylon was the city guilty of “all the blood shed on the earth” (Rev 18:20-24). In Matthew 23:35, Jesus said Jerusalem was guilty of shedding all the blood shed on the earth.
  • Babylon killed Jesus’ apostles and prophets (Rev 18:20-24). Jerusalem was the city guilty of killing the apostles and prophets of Jesus” (Matt 23:34f).
  • It is the city whose cup of sin for shedding all of that blood was now full (Rev 17:6f).
  • The judgment of that city was coming soon, shortly, and was at hand (Rev 14:6-8/ 22:6-20).

We thus have in Revelation every constituent element that Jesus spoke of in Matthew 23, (and by Paul in 2 Thess) as He condemned the Jews for their long history of shedding innocent blood and as He predicted that they would kill His apostles and prophets.

Finally, consider that in Luke 18:8 Jesus said: “Will not God avenge the elect who cry to Him day and night? Verily I say unto you, He will avenge them shortly.” The Greek translated as “shortly” is en taxei, a term that never speaks of rapidity of action versus imminence of occurrence. When one considers this text in light of Matthew 23, 2 Thessalonians, and Revelation, there is no basis whatsoever to change the meaning of “this generation” from Jesus’ contemporary generation and apply it to some yet future time.

For the objection above to be valid, it would have to be proven that Jesus was speaking of some other people, some other generation from that spoken of by Paul and by John. Yet, both Paul and John speak of the same blood guilt, the same perpetrators of the blood guilt, the same victims of the persecution and the same temporal framework for the vindication of the martyrs and the judgment of the persecutors. There is literally not a syllable of support for such a dichotomization.

We have thus established that it was that first century “this generation” Jerusalem that would fill the measure of her blood guilt, and we have proven that judgment on her was to be in that generation. Thus, the objection is overruled!

See my book, Who Is This Babylon? for an in-depth discussion of the avenging of the blood of the martyrs. In that book, I demonstrate that it is exegetically untenable to posit Matthew 23 or any of the Bible prophecies of the last days’ avenging of the martyrs to any other time than AD 70.


Ron Luff September 14, 2022
Dear Don,
I read Fulfilled! Magazine, appreciate your pieces in "Objection Overruled!", and have a question concerning the " elect".
2 Peter 3:9 reads:

"The Lord is not slack concerning His promise, as some count slackness, but is longsuffering toward us, not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance."

The "any" and "all" in the verse cannot be referring to anyone or everyone, for that would speak toward a universal salvation of all mankind. It must be referring exclusively to the elect to whom Peter is writing. However, there is yet more that must be clarified.

If the elect is defined (as many today do) that the elect is every child of God, then there would never be a fulfillment, for each new generation would bring forth more who are foreknown by Him and will eventually repent and embrace Him. This implies that Peter saw the elect to whom he was writing as extending only through a limited period of time: ie, the generation of the new testament era.

If so, then the elect would (at least in a sense) be the exclusive first fruits that sanctify the overall harvest in which we today are a part - a harvest the extends into perpetuity, "through all generations, for ever and ever" (Eph. 3:21).

Do you agree? Have you written anything on that passage?

Sorry for the lengthy setup, it's a difficult question to frame. Thank you for your time.

God Bless,
Ron Luff

Your honest review will help others in their search for truth. If you must leave a negative review please be gracious.

Rather, speaking the truth in love, we are to grow up in every way into him who the head, into Christ . . . .
(Ephesians 4:15)